"Romneycare" versus "Obamacare"... and a little bit about healthcare?
(Article: http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/01/29/why-mitt-romneys-electability-is-not-inevitable/)
Well true to the political bias that most display when selecting news sources...I decided to look at our handy dandy recommended blogging guide, ultimately choosing "Redstate." Might as well embrace my inner conservative. I mean, as Jill can attest, I am the one to say "No we cant sit on the blue metro seat, lets sit on the red one...RED...power color." It was a joke at the time but it is an example of how conservatives really respond to elephants, the color red, and states rights.
This growing partisanship in the United States electorate is just baffling, I mean its not like our culture embraces hanging out with like minded people and perpetuating "fads", however that is besides the point. Reading Redstate today, well it was refreshing to not read another blog about how Romney is the savior to our political party or how Democrats do not know anything. It actually attack the heart of a potential debate in American politics and pointing out the hypocrisy in partisanship when we are all moderate at heart. In this case blogger Ben Howe confronts Governor Mitt Romney on his major weakness: The
Massachusetts Health Care Insurance Reform Law. The bill, known by most as Romneycare, is the basis
for the much "maligned Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act",
otherwise affectionately known as Obamacare.
Howe, comments how Romey supporters claim that Romneycare vs Obamacare
isn’t about socialized medicine vs the free market. They say it’s
actually the core of the Federalist struggle and that "Romney will
channel Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and march onto the capital steps,
fulfilling the dreams and desires of tea partiers nationwide by finally
standing up and saying, “Enough is enough! Let the state’s make their
decisions Obama! Your days of tyranny are at an end!” And they all
rejoiced." WHERE THIS ARTICLE REALLY GETS INTERESTING....Howe offers up some main points that the Romney campaign will use to battle in the general election...and it’s all right out of the Obama
playbook and talking points. How about that for some added center left/center right equality. Their plan actually seems to be to take
the fight to the capital by saying:
- "Public health insurance didn’t crowd out employer sponsored insurance in Massachusetts
- That any mandate, be it for public schools or for car insurance, is
evidence that a mandate is perfectly acceptable even when it’s a mandate
related to your right to exist.
- That costs are being contained and kept down as a result of the bill
and that the uninsured are now insured and the free rides are over.
- That the mandate is only a technicality because anyone can choose not to be a part of it by simply paying a fee every year.
- That the people of Massachusetts wanted healthcare reform and that a
duly elected legislature passed the bill and thus it’s perfectly
acceptable and reasonable."
If these defenses sound familiar it’s because they are virtually
identical to the defenses we heard for a year and a half leading up to
the passage of Obamacare. So get ready for Elections 2012, a battle to identify center right from center left, because lets face it there is truly no difference in the 21st century. Ultimately, despite the attacks that this article does make from time to time, the blog post does demonstrate how both political parties are in reality identical books, however option B used a theasaurus for every eighth word. This is a case where the media covers something of significance and what I would in fact consider modern day muck-racking...journalists and bloggers going out to identify the lack of continuity in political speech by politicians. Healthcare was an issue that bloggers and media analysts alike converged on in the past few years, debating the mandate, and the constitutionality of it all. It became an issue that was fought on partisan lines when in reality there wasn't much difference in what everyone was seeking when you looked at the moderates and avoided the fringes. I commend Howe for stepping up against his political party and partisan blogging and highlighting the issues at hand, if more bloggers took on their own party and helped to identify their weaknesses and strengths then the debates in the coming Presidential election could be quite substantive.
I guess we will just have to see how this whole healthcare deal works out come September...
